<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:25:02 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/"><rss:title>Saratoga Futures Blog</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2010-03-14T18:25:02Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/4/e-mini-ndx-levels.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/4/e-mini-sp-levels.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/bank-index.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/e-mini-ndx-levels.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/e-mini-sp-levels.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/futures-vs-etfs-3110.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/electronic-vs-pit-volume-3110.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/e-mini-ndx-levels.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/e-mini-sp-levels.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/1/futures-vs-etfs-22610.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/4/e-mini-ndx-levels.html"><rss:title>e-mini NDX Levels</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/4/e-mini-ndx-levels.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-04T14:48:10Z</dc:date><dc:subject>emini NDX Futures Levels</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;*** Liquidity switches from March (H) to the June (M) contract on the 11th ***</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">We&rsquo;ll be on hiatus, so today is the last note until the 15th.</p>
<p>The March e-mini NDX (NQ) traded in a tight range of 84 bps yesterday, with no test of Tuesday&rsquo;s high or low and it closed down 0.50 points at 1852.&nbsp; Yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/NQ5_0304.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/NQ5_0304.jpg" target="_blank">session</a> started strong and NQ reached its 1861.25 high within the first 90 minutes.&nbsp; Over the next half hour, NQ retested the high twice before it rolled over.&nbsp; The decline paused near the morning low (1851.50) before NQ sold off again and tested the 1848 level (1845.75 low).&nbsp; The rally off the low found resistance at 1853, the bottom of the 1853 to 1894 range from 12/24 to 1/20 mentioned yesterday.&nbsp; We also noticed that 1856 has provided resistance over the past 2 days, it is a Fibonacci extension based on the trading between 2/5 and 2/25.&nbsp; Overnight trading took NQ below yesterday&rsquo;s low (1844.25), with it back in positive territory at the moment.&nbsp; Support @ 1848, 1841.75, 1825, 1813.75, 1804, 1788.75 and 1774.50.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1864, 1871.75, 1886.75 and 1902.75.</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/4/e-mini-sp-levels.html"><rss:title>e-mini S&amp;P Levels</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/4/e-mini-sp-levels.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-04T13:47:24Z</dc:date><dc:subject>emini S&amp;P Futures Levels</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">*** Liquidity switches from March (H) to the June (M) contract on the 11th ***</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">We&rsquo;ll be on hiatus, so today is the last note until the 15th.</p>
<p>The March E-Mini S&amp;P (ES) closed 1118.50 yesterday, up 1 point to extend its win streak to 4 days.&nbsp; There was no test of the 50% Fibonacci retracement (1126.25 vs. 1125 high), but the 1119.25 level provided resistance.&nbsp; At the start of yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/ES5_0304.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/ES5_0304.jpg" target="_blank">session</a>, 1119.25 provided support as ES was on its way to the 1125 high about 90 minutes later.&nbsp; From the high, NQ trended lower and about 3 hours later it retested 1119.25.&nbsp; The break of the level took ES to the 1115.50 equity session low (1115 low on the day) before it rallied back to test 1119.25 over the final hour.&nbsp; Volume was up a little, but it remains very weak.&nbsp; Following up on yesterday&rsquo;s comment about how it&rsquo;s difficult to be bullish here, we take a look at the S&amp;P Depository Receipts (SPY) instead of ES because some candlestick formations don&rsquo;t apply in 24 hour markets.&nbsp; <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/SPY03-04.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/SPY03-04.jpg" target="_blank">Notice</a> the long upper shadows in SPY over the past 2 days &ndash; early rallies are being sold off into the close &ndash; not a bullish sign.&nbsp; Overnight trading took ES below yesterday&rsquo;s low down to 1114, with it back near unchanged ahead of Jobless Claims.&nbsp; Post claims, ES is back testing the 1119.25 level.&nbsp; Support @ 1119.25, 1108, 1103, 1096.25, 1084.50, 1069.50 and 1061.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1126.25, 1131.75, 1148.25, 1153, 1168.25 and 1184.</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/bank-index.html"><rss:title>Bank Index</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/bank-index.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-03T17:43:07Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Charts</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our original <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/2/22/bank-index.html" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/2/22/bank-index.html" target="_blank">post</a> from 2/22, BKX was approaching the top of a symmetrical triangle formation (<a class="offsite-link-inline" title="http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:symmetrical_triangle" href="http://stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart_school:chart_analysis:chart_patterns:symmetrical_triangle" target="_blank">definition</a>). &nbsp;It&nbsp;closed&nbsp;above the top of triangle that day, but not above our 48.3 threshold. &nbsp;Since then, BKX has <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/BKX03-03.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/BKX03-03.jpg" target="_blank">oscillated</a> around the top of the triangle. &nbsp;The threshold is now a close above 48.15 and a&nbsp;breakout&nbsp;still projects near 58. &nbsp;Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/e-mini-ndx-levels.html"><rss:title>e-mini NDX Levels</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/e-mini-ndx-levels.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-03T14:16:25Z</dc:date><dc:subject>emini NDX Futures Levels</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">*** Liquidity switches from March (H) to the June (M) contract on the 11th ***</p>
<p>The March e-mini NDX (NQ) rallied up to 1862.25 yesterday - no test of the 1864 level &ndash; but it faded over the final 2 hours to close 1852.25, up 52 bps.&nbsp; NQ began yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/NQ5_0303.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/NQ5_0303.jpg" target="_blank">session</a> above the 1848 level and traded sideways with a slight upward bias into the 1862.25 high 4 1/2 hours later.&nbsp; From the high, NQ moved lower and 2 hours later it tested the 1848 level (1846.50 low, 1842.50 low on the day).&nbsp; 1848 held and NQ ticked up a bit into the close.&nbsp; Yesterday&rsquo;s reversal off the high could have been caused by the supply that NQ ran into from the 12/24 to 1/20 range &ndash; about 1853 to 1894.&nbsp; Something we also noticed is the continued absence of volume that we also highlighted on the <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/NQ03-03.jp" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/NQ03-03.jpg" target="_blank">chart</a>.&nbsp; As long as there is no close above 1864, we see no need for further upside projections.&nbsp; Overnight trading tested the 1848 level (1847.75 low), with NQ back in positive territory here.&nbsp; Support @ 1848, 1841.75, 1825, 1813.75, 1804, 1788.75 and 1774.50.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1864, 1871.75, 1886.75 and 1902.75.</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/e-mini-sp-levels.html"><rss:title>e-mini S&amp;P Levels</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/3/e-mini-sp-levels.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-03T13:43:25Z</dc:date><dc:subject>emini S&amp;P Futures Levels</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">*** Liquidity switches from March (H) to the June (M) contract on the 11th ***</p>
<p>The March E-Mini S&amp;P (ES) added 3 points yesterday, as it followed through on Monday&rsquo;s gain and closed 1117.50, 1 tick below the midpoint of yesterday&rsquo;s narrow 1112.75 &ndash; 1122.75 range.&nbsp; ES oscillated around the 1119.25 level for all of yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/ES5_0303.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/ES5_0303.jpg" target="_blank">session</a> and traded within an even narrower range of 1115.25 &ndash; 1122.75.&nbsp; Volume continued to decline yesterday and the volume <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/ES03-03.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/ES03-03.jpg" target="_blank">picture</a> makes it difficult to be bullish here.&nbsp; The decline into early February was on increasing volume and the rally over the past month has been on declining volume.&nbsp; Is this a &ldquo;climbing a wall of worry&rdquo; kind of thing?&nbsp; There was no test of the 50% Fibonacci retracement (1126.25) of the range from the October 2007 (using the December 2007 contract &ndash; 1586.75 high) to the March 2009 (March 2009 contract &ndash; 665.75 low).&nbsp; A close above there and we would have to look for higher prices.&nbsp; Overnight trading has been in a 4.5 point range with no test of the 1119.25 level.&nbsp; Support @ 1119.25, 1108, 1103, 1096.25, 1084.50, 1069.50 and 1061.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1126.25, 1131.75, 1148.25, 1153, 1168.25 and 1184.</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/futures-vs-etfs-3110.html"><rss:title>Futures vs. ETFs 3/1/10</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/futures-vs-etfs-3110.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-02T19:47:49Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Futures Data</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<caption> </caption><thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Future</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Factor*</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">ETF</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" scope="col">Futures Liquidity   Multiple</th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td>ES</td>
<td>1,615,001</td>
<td>500</td>
<td>SPY</td>
<td>147,709,648</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">NASDAQ 100</td>
<td>NQ</td>
<td>257,074</td>
<td>800</td>
<td>QQQQ</td>
<td>77,290,016</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Russell 2000</td>
<td>TF</td>
<td>135,745</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>70,971,112</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Gold</td>
<td>GC</td>
<td>128,997</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>GLD</td>
<td>12,830,851</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Silver</td>
<td>SI</td>
<td>26,684</td>
<td>10000</td>
<td>SLV</td>
<td>6,955,080<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">38.4<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Crude Oil</td>
<td>CL</td>
<td>481,835</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>USO</td>
<td>9,702,257</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">49.7<br /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Factor - the number of ETF shares that are approximately equivalent in notional value to the notional value of one futures     contract</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/electronic-vs-pit-volume-3110.html"><rss:title>Electronic vs. Pit Volume 3/1/10</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/electronic-vs-pit-volume-3110.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-02T19:46:17Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Futures Data</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Electronic Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Pit Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Percent Electronic of Total Volume<br /></th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Crude Oil</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">481,835<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">26,175<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">95%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Natural Gas</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">156,099<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">27,881<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">85%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Corn</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">189,611</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">23,349<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">89%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Soybeans</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">91,147</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12,779<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Wheat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">75,954<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,393</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">97%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Live Cattle</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">24,902</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">15,574<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">62%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">Lean Hogs</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">22,177</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10,459</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">68%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Gold</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">128,997</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10,775</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">92%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Silver</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">26,684<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">991<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Copper</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">49,553</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,896</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">94%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/e-mini-ndx-levels.html"><rss:title>e-mini NDX Levels</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/e-mini-ndx-levels.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-02T14:13:37Z</dc:date><dc:subject>emini NDX Futures Levels</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The March e-mini NDX (NQ) managed to close 1842.75 yesterday, above the 62% Fibonacci (1825.1) and the 1841.75 level, albeit on low volume again &ndash; 257M contracts vs. 306M average.&nbsp; The last day with volume more than a couple percent above average was on February 5th, which was 40% above average.&nbsp; Volume on 2/23 was less than 1% above average and on 2/25 it was less than 10% above; otherwise 13 of last 15 days have seen below average volume.&nbsp; There was no test of the 1825 level during yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/NQ5_0302.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/NQ5_0302.jpg" target="_blank">session</a> (1825.75 low, 1818.50 low on the day) and 90 minutes in, NQ reached the 1841.75 level.&nbsp; For the 5 1/4 hours that followed, NQ traded sideways between 1840.75 and the 1848.50 high.&nbsp; Yesterday, we thought a close above 1825 would take NQ between 1848 and 1864 and we&rsquo;re already there.&nbsp; Overnight trading took NQ up to 1854.50, with it still above the 1848 level at the moment.&nbsp; Support @ 1848, 1841.75, 1825, 1813.75, 1804, 1788.75 and 1774.50.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1864, 1871.75, 1886.75 and 1902.75 (new).</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/e-mini-sp-levels.html"><rss:title>e-mini S&amp;P Levels</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/2/e-mini-sp-levels.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-02T13:41:41Z</dc:date><dc:subject>emini S&amp;P Futures Levels</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The March E-Mini S&amp;P (ES) managed to close 1114.50 yesterday, the first close above the 1103 &ndash; 1108 congestion area since 1/21.&nbsp; Volume was light again - 1.6MM contracts vs. 2MM average.&nbsp; ES tested the 1108 level for the 1st 30 minutes of yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/ES5_0302.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/ES5_0302.jpg" target="_blank">session</a> (1106.75 low, 1103.50 low on the day) and then it trended higher for the next 2 hours up to 1114.75.&nbsp; From there, ES traded sideways between 1111.50 and 1115.50 (the high) for over 4 hours.&nbsp; With the close above the 1108 level, we no longer have buyer&rsquo;s remorse on our short ES idea.&nbsp; We looked back at the range from the October 2007 (using the December 2007 contract &ndash; 1586.75 high) to the March 2009 (March 2009 contract &ndash; 665.75 low) and ES is approaching the 50% <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/ES03-02.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/ES03-02.jpg" target="_blank">retracement</a> again &ndash; 1126.25.&nbsp; ES was above the retracement from January 4th through the 20th before it moved down to 1040.75 on February 5th.&nbsp; Not far from the retracement is a Fibonacci extension drawn from the 2/5 low &ndash; 1129.&nbsp; Let&rsquo;s see if ES has the legs to close above those levels.&nbsp; That could cause bears to throw in the towel.&nbsp; Overnight trading took ES to 1122.75, with it still above the 1119.25 level.&nbsp; Support @ 1119.25, 1108, 1103, 1096.25, 1084.50, 1069.50 and 1061.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1126.25 (new), 1131.75, 1148.25, 1153, 1168.25 and 1184 (new).</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/1/futures-vs-etfs-22610.html"><rss:title>Futures vs. ETFs 2/26/10</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/1/futures-vs-etfs-22610.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-01T20:09:38Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Futures Data</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<caption> </caption><thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Future</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Factor*</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">ETF</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" scope="col">Futures Liquidity     Multiple</th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td>ES</td>
<td>1,944,020</td>
<td>500</td>
<td>SPY</td>
<td>173,589,232</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">5.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">NASDAQ 100</td>
<td>NQ</td>
<td>223,029</td>
<td>800</td>
<td>QQQQ</td>
<td>66,222,356</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Russell 2000</td>
<td>TF</td>
<td>112,011</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>60,097,936</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1.9</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Gold</td>
<td>GC</td>
<td>132,335</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>GLD</td>
<td>13,036,630</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Silver</td>
<td>SI</td>
<td>34,589</td>
<td>10000</td>
<td>SLV</td>
<td>10,804,061<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">32.0<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Crude Oil</td>
<td>CL</td>
<td>560,290</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>USO</td>
<td>9,106,798</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">61.5<br /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Factor - the number of ETF shares that are approximately equivalent in notional value to the notional value of one futures       contract</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>