<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:07:57 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Saratoga Futures Blog</title><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:06:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Futures vs. ETFs 3/18/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:06:17 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/19/futures-vs-etfs-31810.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7069167</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<caption> </caption><thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Future</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Factor*</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">ETF</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" scope="col">Futures Liquidity     Multiple</th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td>ES</td>
<td>1,819,642</td>
<td>500</td>
<td>SPY</td>
<td>196,509,040</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">NASDAQ 100</td>
<td>NQ</td>
<td>245,304</td>
<td>800</td>
<td>QQQQ</td>
<td>77,829,360</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Russell 2000</td>
<td>TF</td>
<td>125,236</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>71,535,096</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Gold</td>
<td>GC</td>
<td>135,916</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>GLD</td>
<td>13,853,486</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Silver</td>
<td>SI</td>
<td>25,879</td>
<td>10000</td>
<td>SLV</td>
<td>7,119,583<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">36.3<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Crude Oil</td>
<td>CL</td>
<td>590,837</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>USO</td>
<td>7,573,982</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">78.0<br /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Factor - the number of ETF shares that are approximately equivalent in notional value to the notional value of one futures       contract</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7069167.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Electronic vs. Pit Volume 3/18/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:05:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/19/electronic-vs-pit-volume-31810.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7069165</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Electronic Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Pit Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Percent Electronic of Total Volume<br /></th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Crude Oil</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">590,837<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">39,457<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">94%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Natural Gas</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">334,485<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">34,822<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">91%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Corn</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">150,628</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">21,185<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Soybeans</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">87,627</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">12,400<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Wheat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">58,476<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,206</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Live Cattle</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">33,787</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">20,227<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">63%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">Lean Hogs</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">24,705</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9,727</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">72%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Gold</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">135,916</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8,593</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">94%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Silver</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25,879<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1,192<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Copper</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">22,357</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1,201</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">95%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7069165.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>e-mini NDX Levels</title><category>emini NDX Futures Levels</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:11:38 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/19/e-mini-ndx-levels.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7066062</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The June e-mini NDX (NQ) continued its move higher yesterday and traded to another contract highest close (1941.75, +7.75), but not a highest high (1942.75 vs. 1943.75).&nbsp; NQ has now advanced in 13 of the past 15 sessions.&nbsp; For the first 90 minutes of yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/NQ5_0319.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/NQ5_0319.jpg" target="_blank">session</a>, NQ traded +/- 3 points around the 1935.50 level and then that range expanded to +/- 5 points over the 2 hours that followed.&nbsp; For the final 3 hours, NQ did not test 1935.50 (1935.75 low) and it closed at the high.&nbsp; There was no test of the <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/Cont_NQ_03-19.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/Cont_NQ_03-19.jpg" target="_blank">trendline</a> again yesterday (about 1927.5, 1928.1 today), but the close was more than 10 points above the line, so we now look for a move to the 1972.25 level.&nbsp; Overnight trading has NQ at new contract highs (1946.75 high) ahead of today&rsquo;s quadruple witching.&nbsp; Support @ 1935.50, 1916.75, 1900.50, 1884.50 and 1872.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1944, 1961.50, 1972.25 and 1997.25.</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7066062.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>e-mini S&amp;P Levels</title><category>emini S&amp;P Futures Levels</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:28:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/19/e-mini-sp-levels.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7065867</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The June E-Mini S&amp;P (ES) traded in a tight 67 bps range yesterday and closed 1161.25, up 0.25 and still below the 1161.75 level.&nbsp; So since the 10.25 point decline on 2/23, ES has advanced in 15 of the 17 sessions with a total decline of 2 points on the 2 down days (-1.25 on 2/25, -0.75 on 3/15).&nbsp; ES came close (1163.25 high, 1164 high on the day) to a test of the <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/Cont_ES_03-19.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/Cont_ES_03-19.jpg" target="_blank">trendline</a> early in yesterday&rsquo;s equity <a class="offsite-link-inline" title="/storage/ES5_0319.jpg" href="http://www.saratogafutures.com/storage/ES5_0319.jpg" target="_blank">session</a> (1163.50, about 1164.3 today) and found resistance at the 1161.75 level for the first 2 hours,&nbsp; The midday dip took ES down to 1156.25 before it reversed back up to test 1161.75 for the final 40 minutes.&nbsp; Overnight trading has been within a 3 point range (26 bps) ahead of today&rsquo;s quadruple witching.&nbsp; We&rsquo;ll continue to watch 1161.75 and the trendline.&nbsp; A close above the trendline (by at least 50 bps) and 1181 looks likely.&nbsp; Support @ 1151.75, 1145.50, 1133.50, 1121.50, 1114.50, 1108 and 1094.&nbsp; Resistance @ 1161.75, 1171, 1181, 1196, 1208.50 and 1236.</p>
<p>Chart Source: TradeStation</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7065867.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Futures vs. ETFs 3/17/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:17:24 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/18/futures-vs-etfs-31710.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7052944</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<caption> </caption><thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Future</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Factor*</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">ETF</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" scope="col">Futures Liquidity     Multiple</th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td>ES</td>
<td>2,421,517</td>
<td>500</td>
<td>SPY</td>
<td>177,468,080</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">NASDAQ 100</td>
<td>NQ</td>
<td>335,626</td>
<td>800</td>
<td>QQQQ</td>
<td>75,643,456</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Russell 2000</td>
<td>TF</td>
<td>120,499</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>53,591,400</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.2</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Gold</td>
<td>GC</td>
<td>147,244</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>GLD</td>
<td>13,784,691</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Silver</td>
<td>SI</td>
<td>25,532</td>
<td>10000</td>
<td>SLV</td>
<td>6,403,788<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">39.9<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Crude Oil</td>
<td>CL</td>
<td>604,452</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>USO</td>
<td>12,552,851</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">48.2<br /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Factor - the number of ETF shares that are approximately equivalent in notional value to the notional value of one futures       contract</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7052944.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Electronic vs. Pit Volume 3/17/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:17:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/18/electronic-vs-pit-volume-31710.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7052940</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Electronic Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Pit Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Percent Electronic of Total Volume<br /></th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Crude Oil</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">604,452<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">47,502<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">93%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Natural Gas</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">156,632<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">21,572<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Corn</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">139,107</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">19,674<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Soybeans</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">99,615</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">11,243<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Wheat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">57,069<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1,860</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">97%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Live Cattle</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25,572</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">15,420<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">62%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">Lean Hogs</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">18,560</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">6,579</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">74%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Gold</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">147,244</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">9,738</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">94%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Silver</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25,532<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">373<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">99%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Copper</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25,156</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">888</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">97%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7052940.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Futures vs. ETFs 3/16/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:07:58 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/18/futures-vs-etfs-31610.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7052847</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<caption> </caption><thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Future</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Factor*</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">ETF</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" scope="col">Futures Liquidity     Multiple</th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td>ES</td>
<td>2,544,902</td>
<td>500</td>
<td>SPY</td>
<td>168,672,992</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7.5</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">NASDAQ 100</td>
<td>NQ</td>
<td>341,081</td>
<td>800</td>
<td>QQQQ</td>
<td>74,950,592</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Russell 2000</td>
<td>TF</td>
<td>112,413</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>52,878,112</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.1</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Gold</td>
<td>GC</td>
<td>156,353</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>GLD</td>
<td>17,754,514</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">8.8</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Silver</td>
<td>SI</td>
<td>28,910</td>
<td>10000</td>
<td>SLV</td>
<td>8,699,428<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">33.2<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Crude Oil</td>
<td>CL</td>
<td>621,668</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>USO</td>
<td>12,765,233</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">48.7<br /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Factor - the number of ETF shares that are approximately equivalent in notional value to the notional value of one futures       contract</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7052847.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Electronic vs. Pit Volume 3/16/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:06:48 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/18/electronic-vs-pit-volume-31610.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7052838</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Electronic Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Pit Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Percent Electronic of Total Volume<br /></th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Crude Oil</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">621,668<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">33,524<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">95%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Natural Gas</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">208,449<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">30,060<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">87%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Corn</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">108,404</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">14,031<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">89%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Soybeans</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">93,726</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">18,087<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">89%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Wheat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">43,738<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1,717</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">96%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Live Cattle</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">25,832</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">18,272<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">59%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">Lean Hogs</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">21,666</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7,803</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">74%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Gold</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">156,353</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">10,061</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">94%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Silver</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">28,910<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,421<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">92%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Copper</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">28,691</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2,307</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">93%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7052838.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Futures vs. ETFs 3/15/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:43:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/18/futures-vs-etfs-31510.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7052682</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<caption> </caption><thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Future</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Factor*</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">ETF</th><th class="mceVisualAid" scope="col">Volume</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" scope="col">Futures Liquidity     Multiple</th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">S&amp;P 500</td>
<td>ES</td>
<td>2,236,702</td>
<td>500</td>
<td>SPY</td>
<td>146,816,800</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">NASDAQ 100</td>
<td>NQ</td>
<td>351,403</td>
<td>800</td>
<td>QQQQ</td>
<td>60,150,420</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">4.7</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Russell 2000</td>
<td>TF</td>
<td>115,896</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>49,874,268</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2.3</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Gold</td>
<td>GC</td>
<td>158,362</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>GLD</td>
<td>7,700,873</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">20.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn">Silver</td>
<td>SI</td>
<td>19,383</td>
<td>10000</td>
<td>SLV</td>
<td>4,834,234<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">40.1<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn">Crude Oil</td>
<td>CL</td>
<td>510,016</td>
<td>1000</td>
<td>USO</td>
<td>9,729,155</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">52.4<br /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Factor - the number of ETF shares that are approximately equivalent in notional value to the notional value of one futures       contract</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7052682.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Electronic vs. Pit Volume 3/15/10</title><category>Futures Data</category><dc:creator>Jay L</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:42:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/2010/3/18/electronic-vs-pit-volume-31510.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">191786:2110216:7052679</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS</p>
<table class="tableStyle greyScheme" border="0">
<thead> 
<tr>
<th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Product</th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Electronic Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Pit Volume<br /></th><th class="mceVisualAid" style="text-align: center;" align="middle" scope="col">Percent Electronic of Total Volume<br /></th>
</tr>
</thead> 
<tbody>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Crude Oil</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">510,016<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">35,588<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">93%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Natural Gas</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">185,640<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">19,037<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">91%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Corn</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">108,791</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">14,437<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Soybeans</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">78,684</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">11,968<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">88%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Wheat</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">29,962<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1,712</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">95%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td class="firstColumn" style="text-align: center;">Live Cattle</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">30,145</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">17,404<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">63%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">Lean Hogs</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">14,591</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">7,753</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">65%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Gold</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">158,362</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">20,134</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">89%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Silver</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">19,383<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">343<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;">98%<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td style="text-align: center;">COMEX Copper</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">26,629</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">937</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">97%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.saratogafutures.com/saratoga-futures-blog/rss-comments-entry-7052679.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>